Review



dexcom g4 platinum sensor  (Dexcom Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 86
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Dexcom Inc dexcom g4 platinum sensor
    Proposed amended reporting format for CGM sensor measurement limit capping, illustrated using two exemplar 14-day windows from the Aleppo 2017 Replace-BG trial (Dexcom <t>G4</t> Platinum) for the participant with the highest proportion of upper-limit capped readings (A-D) and the participant with the highest proportion of lower-limit capped readings (E-H). Panels A and E show the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) with median glucose (red line) and shaded 25–75% and 10–90% interpercentile ranges. Grey shaded bands above and below the dashed device detection limit lines (400 and 40 mg/dL) indicate the glucose range that cannot be measured by the device. Panels B and F show glucose-range exposure as a stacked bar chart, with black segments at the top and bottom representing readings at or beyond the device detection limits, extending the standard display. Panels C and G summarise conventional window-level metrics alongside device-limit capping statistics (frequency and longest run duration), and panels D and H show the glucose frequency distribution with lower and upper capped bins shaded black. These display elements are proposed as optional additions to standard CGM reporting software, to be shown only when capping is present.
    Dexcom G4 Platinum Sensor, supplied by Dexcom Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dexcom g4 platinum sensor/product/Dexcom Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dexcom g4 platinum sensor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Prevalence, duration, and clinical implications of Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) measurement limit capping in type 1 diabetes"

    Article Title: Prevalence, duration, and clinical implications of Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) measurement limit capping in type 1 diabetes

    Journal: medRxiv

    doi: 10.64898/2026.05.13.26353094

    Proposed amended reporting format for CGM sensor measurement limit capping, illustrated using two exemplar 14-day windows from the Aleppo 2017 Replace-BG trial (Dexcom G4 Platinum) for the participant with the highest proportion of upper-limit capped readings (A-D) and the participant with the highest proportion of lower-limit capped readings (E-H). Panels A and E show the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) with median glucose (red line) and shaded 25–75% and 10–90% interpercentile ranges. Grey shaded bands above and below the dashed device detection limit lines (400 and 40 mg/dL) indicate the glucose range that cannot be measured by the device. Panels B and F show glucose-range exposure as a stacked bar chart, with black segments at the top and bottom representing readings at or beyond the device detection limits, extending the standard display. Panels C and G summarise conventional window-level metrics alongside device-limit capping statistics (frequency and longest run duration), and panels D and H show the glucose frequency distribution with lower and upper capped bins shaded black. These display elements are proposed as optional additions to standard CGM reporting software, to be shown only when capping is present.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Proposed amended reporting format for CGM sensor measurement limit capping, illustrated using two exemplar 14-day windows from the Aleppo 2017 Replace-BG trial (Dexcom G4 Platinum) for the participant with the highest proportion of upper-limit capped readings (A-D) and the participant with the highest proportion of lower-limit capped readings (E-H). Panels A and E show the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) with median glucose (red line) and shaded 25–75% and 10–90% interpercentile ranges. Grey shaded bands above and below the dashed device detection limit lines (400 and 40 mg/dL) indicate the glucose range that cannot be measured by the device. Panels B and F show glucose-range exposure as a stacked bar chart, with black segments at the top and bottom representing readings at or beyond the device detection limits, extending the standard display. Panels C and G summarise conventional window-level metrics alongside device-limit capping statistics (frequency and longest run duration), and panels D and H show the glucose frequency distribution with lower and upper capped bins shaded black. These display elements are proposed as optional additions to standard CGM reporting software, to be shown only when capping is present.

    Techniques Used: Software



    Similar Products

    dexcom g4 platinum sensor  (Dexcom Inc)
    86
    Dexcom Inc dexcom g4 platinum sensor
    Proposed amended reporting format for CGM sensor measurement limit capping, illustrated using two exemplar 14-day windows from the Aleppo 2017 Replace-BG trial (Dexcom <t>G4</t> Platinum) for the participant with the highest proportion of upper-limit capped readings (A-D) and the participant with the highest proportion of lower-limit capped readings (E-H). Panels A and E show the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) with median glucose (red line) and shaded 25–75% and 10–90% interpercentile ranges. Grey shaded bands above and below the dashed device detection limit lines (400 and 40 mg/dL) indicate the glucose range that cannot be measured by the device. Panels B and F show glucose-range exposure as a stacked bar chart, with black segments at the top and bottom representing readings at or beyond the device detection limits, extending the standard display. Panels C and G summarise conventional window-level metrics alongside device-limit capping statistics (frequency and longest run duration), and panels D and H show the glucose frequency distribution with lower and upper capped bins shaded black. These display elements are proposed as optional additions to standard CGM reporting software, to be shown only when capping is present.
    Dexcom G4 Platinum Sensor, supplied by Dexcom Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dexcom g4 platinum sensor/product/Dexcom Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dexcom g4 platinum sensor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Proposed amended reporting format for CGM sensor measurement limit capping, illustrated using two exemplar 14-day windows from the Aleppo 2017 Replace-BG trial (Dexcom G4 Platinum) for the participant with the highest proportion of upper-limit capped readings (A-D) and the participant with the highest proportion of lower-limit capped readings (E-H). Panels A and E show the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) with median glucose (red line) and shaded 25–75% and 10–90% interpercentile ranges. Grey shaded bands above and below the dashed device detection limit lines (400 and 40 mg/dL) indicate the glucose range that cannot be measured by the device. Panels B and F show glucose-range exposure as a stacked bar chart, with black segments at the top and bottom representing readings at or beyond the device detection limits, extending the standard display. Panels C and G summarise conventional window-level metrics alongside device-limit capping statistics (frequency and longest run duration), and panels D and H show the glucose frequency distribution with lower and upper capped bins shaded black. These display elements are proposed as optional additions to standard CGM reporting software, to be shown only when capping is present.

    Journal: medRxiv

    Article Title: Prevalence, duration, and clinical implications of Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) measurement limit capping in type 1 diabetes

    doi: 10.64898/2026.05.13.26353094

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Proposed amended reporting format for CGM sensor measurement limit capping, illustrated using two exemplar 14-day windows from the Aleppo 2017 Replace-BG trial (Dexcom G4 Platinum) for the participant with the highest proportion of upper-limit capped readings (A-D) and the participant with the highest proportion of lower-limit capped readings (E-H). Panels A and E show the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) with median glucose (red line) and shaded 25–75% and 10–90% interpercentile ranges. Grey shaded bands above and below the dashed device detection limit lines (400 and 40 mg/dL) indicate the glucose range that cannot be measured by the device. Panels B and F show glucose-range exposure as a stacked bar chart, with black segments at the top and bottom representing readings at or beyond the device detection limits, extending the standard display. Panels C and G summarise conventional window-level metrics alongside device-limit capping statistics (frequency and longest run duration), and panels D and H show the glucose frequency distribution with lower and upper capped bins shaded black. These display elements are proposed as optional additions to standard CGM reporting software, to be shown only when capping is present.

    Article Snippet: Our BGM comparison is restricted to a single arm of a single trial using the older Dexcom G4 Platinum sensor (mean absolute relative difference (MARD) ∼14%), which has lower accuracy than the Dexcom G6 (MARD ∼9%) used in three of our four datasets.

    Techniques: Software